| description( |
| "This test checks that toString() round-trip on a function that has a typeof operator applied to a group expression will not remove the grouping." |
| ); |
| |
| // if these return a variable (such as y) instead of |
| // the result of typeof, this means that the parenthesis |
| // got lost somewhere. |
| function typeof_should_preserve_parens(x, y, z) { |
| return typeof (x, y); |
| } |
| |
| function typeof_should_preserve_parens1(x, y, z) { |
| return typeof ((x, y)); |
| } |
| |
| function typeof_should_preserve_parens2(x, y, z) { |
| var z = 33; |
| return typeof (z, (x, y)); |
| } |
| |
| function typeof_should_preserve_parens_multi(x, y, z) { |
| var z = 33; |
| return typeof ((z,(((x, y))))); |
| } |
| |
| unevalf = function(x) { return '(' + x.toString() + ')'; }; |
| |
| function testToString(fn) { |
| // check that toString result evaluates to code that can be evaluated |
| // this doesn't actually reveal the bug that this test is testing |
| shouldBe("unevalf(eval(unevalf("+fn+")))", "unevalf(" + fn + ")"); |
| |
| // check that grouping operator is still there (this test reveals the bug |
| // but will create possible false negative if toString output changes in |
| // the future) |
| shouldBeTrue("/.*\\(+x\\)*, y\\)/.test(unevalf("+fn+"))"); |
| |
| } |
| |
| function testToStringAndReturn(fn, p1, p2, retval) |
| { |
| |
| testToString(fn); |
| |
| // check that function call produces correct result |
| shouldBe("" + fn + "(" + p1 + ", " + p2 +");", retval); |
| |
| // check that function call produces correct result after eval(unevalf) |
| shouldBe("eval(unevalf("+fn+ "))" + "(" + p1 + ", " + p2 +");", retval); |
| } |
| |
| testToStringAndReturn("typeof_should_preserve_parens", "'a'", 1, "'number'"); |
| testToStringAndReturn("typeof_should_preserve_parens1", "'a'", 1, "'number'"); |
| testToStringAndReturn("typeof_should_preserve_parens2", "'a'", 1, "'number'"); |
| testToStringAndReturn("typeof_should_preserve_parens_multi", "'a'", 1, "'number'"); |