| description('Test that we do not overflow the stack while handling regular expressions'); |
| |
| // Base case. |
| shouldThrow('new RegExp(Array(50000).join("(") + "a" + Array(50000).join(")"))', '"SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: too many nested disjunctions"'); |
| |
| { // Verify that a deep JS stack does not help avoiding the error. |
| function recursiveCall(depth) { |
| if (!(depth % 10)) { |
| debug("Creating RegExp at depth " + depth); |
| shouldThrow('new RegExp(Array(50000).join("(") + "a" + Array(50000).join(")"))', '"SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: too many nested disjunctions"'); |
| } |
| if (depth < 100) { |
| recursiveCall(depth + 1); |
| } |
| } |
| recursiveCall(0); |
| } |
| |
| { // Have the deepest nested subpattern surrounded by other expressions. |
| var expression = ""; |
| for (let i = 0; i < 50000; ++i) { |
| expression += "((a)("; |
| } |
| expression += "b"; |
| for (let i = 0; i < 50000; ++i) { |
| expression += ")(c))"; |
| } |
| shouldThrow('new RegExp(expression)', '"SyntaxError: Invalid regular expression: too many nested disjunctions"'); |
| } |